The New Yorker July 21, 2008 Cover: Satire or Racist?

On the fourth week of July 2008, hatful were astonished as The forward- tone of voiceing Yorker Magazine g melt downd the stands. The frustrate page showed Barry Blitts illustration depicting press Obama wearing a traditional Muslim outfit with a whiten cap or taqiyah, a white garment or thawb in light brown overtones projection screening a pair of black drawers and brown sandals. Obamas taqiyah go aftered a turban that showed his ear cock-a-hooply unlike Middle Eastern Arab turbans that cover their ears. Moreover, his thawb length is midway surrounded by the knee and the ankle which reflects an orthodox Muslim dress code.Obama is as well as shown doing a knuckle greeting with his married woman Michelle that Fox newsworthiness E. D. Hill calls a terrorist fist jab that is usually overtaken used by another(prenominal) prominent terrorists (The Acropolis). Meanwhile, Michelle Obama was shown in an afro hairstyle, a black blouse, camou signalizee pants and fleck shoes. She as well as has a bandolier and a grayish-greenish, banana-type assault cash in ones chips slung at her brook. The rifle looked much like an AK47 variant without the AKs trademark brown, wooden broth. invigorate and Michelle stood at the oval office in a happy demeanor. urge was portrayed with his usual serious, but smiling face while Michelles smile was to a greater extent obvious that revealed her prominent cheekbones in a blush. Michelle stood by the left side while urge on stood by the right side. At Barracks mainstay is a golden framed half-faced depiction of Osama put in Laden in pure white cap and robe and sightly below the portrait is a fireplace showing the American flag with flames but not yet burnt.The bleak Yorkers cover page certainly had shock value yet after minute thought and research, the illustration was really a satire rather than a anti-Semite(a) statement. According to the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, a satire is a literary take a crap ho lding up kind-hearted vices and follies to ridicule or scorn and probing wit, mockery, or sarcasm used to expose and discredit vice or folly (satire).The Encyclopedia Britannica further elaborates that a satire is an nice form, chiefly literary and dramatic, in which human or individual vices, follies, abuses, or shortcomings ar held up to censure by means of ridicule, derision, burlesque, irony, parody, caricature, or other methods, sometimes with an intent to inspire social reform (satire). Racism, on the other hand, is a printing that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race and racial prejudice or discrimination according to the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary ( racialism).Racism is further elaborated as any action, practice, or belief that producesthat humans are divided into separate and exclusive biological entitiesand thata causal link between inherited physical tr aits,personality, intellect, morality, and other cultural behavioral features energisesome racesinnately superior than others by the Encyclopedia Britannica (racism). As a satire, the illustration has a meaning behind it and should not be taken literally as what it is shown.However, some people will easily take the meaning of the illustration as a racist statement and think that the artist, Barry Blitt, thinks Barrack Obama and Michelle are not worthy to top this country. The rising Yorker Magazine has been published since February 21, 1925 and is sold nationwide. Its format deals with political description and cartoon covers that are somewhat unreal yet funny.It is in addition kinda proud of its Cartoon Bank and sells prints ofcartoons and covers A quick view on the contents of its July 20, 2009 issue show some topics as follows a) Hendrik Hertzberg on Sarah Palin b) tin Colapinto on Senator Al Franken and c) Elizabeth Colbert on Americas obesity problem, to lean a few. Th e Obama cartoon was published on July 21, 2008 right at the conflagrate of the US Presidential Election campaigns. Various rumors during that time hand circulated accusatory Barrack Obama as a radical Muslim who will not recite the pledge of allegiance (Snopes. om, Barrack Obama) and have sworn in on the Quran as Minnesota Representative Keith Ellison did (The Acropolis) (Snopes. com, Who is Barrack Obama).Issues also included President Barrack ibn Talal ibn Talal ibn Talal Hussein Obama Juniors centre name Hussein which was associated with former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein (Snopes. com, Who is Barrack Obama). Moreover, Obamas wife, Michelle, was not spared from close public scrutiny. Her undergraduate thesis at the Princeton University in 1985 with the statement blacks must join in solidarity to combat a white oppressor has been quoted out of context (Snopes. om, Michelle Obamas Thesis) and detractors have associated such statement with Black Panther Party for Self defendi ng team political activist, Angela Yvonne Davis (Davis). The State of California charged Davis as an accomplice to conspiracy, kidnapping, and homicide for the scattergun registered to her name that killed Judge Harold Haley in an escape attempt of the Soledad Brothers that the Black Panthers support (Davis). Davis has been acquitted then she temporarily relocated to Cuba before going back to the United States and ran as a candidate for the Communist Party regular army (Davis).With these rumors, the Blitt cartoon cover for the parvenue Yorker can in a flash be to a greater extent easily understood. Obama has been dressed as an orthodox Muslim to depict rumors nigh him as an Islamic radical. In addition, since Obama has been educated in Indonesia as a kid, his Muslim attire closely resembled Indonesian Muslim dress codes rather than the Middle Eastern Muslims. Accusations against Obama for his unpatriotic behavior have also been symbolized by the American flag thrown into the fla mes of the Oval delegacys fireplace. Michelle has also been portrayed in an Afro hairstyle that was synonymous to Angela Davis.Moreover, since Davis had ties to Cuba, Michelle was dressed as a ultra in camouflage pants with an assault rifle at her back that looked like an AK47a popular symbol among Communist revolutionaries. It can now also be easily discerned why Osama Bin Ladens portrait was in the backdrop. First, Obama sounded like Osama. Second, Obamas middle name Hussein is the same as former Iraqi dictator Saddam Husseins. These two world figures tied Obama to the rumors that Barrack was a Muslim extremist. As John Aravosis of Weblog described the cartoon New Yorker thinks its funny to substantiate Mrs.Obama some radical black panther, Barrack Obama basically a terroristand theyre plain burning the American flag in the Oval Office (Stirland). The New Yorker cover on Barrack and Michelle Obama is a satire for the by-line reasons a) the magazine has a composition for sati rical cartoons portraying political issues and personalities b) the artist, Barry Blitt, is a know satirist and has made statements on the issues and rumors surrounding Obama and c) the cartoon or artwork itself is full of symbolisms that convey irony and sarcasm.Following the same track, Blitts illustration is really not a racist statement against Barrack Obama because the New Yorker is a liberal, cosmopolitan publication and the symbolisms of the cartoon show otherwise. A quick look into the New Yorker archives show that the magazine has been undifferentiated since 1925 on its satire, focus on American politics, and political humor. It has developed its reputation along these lines. In a pro-Obama blog entry in The Acropolis, Dylan the blogger has this to arrange Obviously, the New Yorker cover was satirical. It also elaborates that Even faithful Fox News watchers will have to see the cover and hear anchors admit that it is a satirethat the images it depicts are making fun of ru mors that are not true. Likewise, in an anti-Obama blog entry in the Old Atlantic Lighthouse notes The New Yorker Magazineis now in full retreat mode to say it was simply mocking Christianity, Israel, America, the West, white people, the Constitution, self rule, and the resistance to Islam. just about of all, New Yorker editor, David Remnick, explained the controversial cover The idea is to attack the lies and misconceptions and distortions about the Obamas and their priming and their politics (Stirland). Also, Barry Blitt is a known satirist. He has nine illustrations in the New Yorker with the title The Politics of Satire. He has also made statements about the cover like I think the idea that the Obamas are branded as unpatriotic in certain sectors is preposterous, and It seemed to me that depicting the concept would show it as the fear-mongering ridiculousness that it is. Most of all, his illustration is titled The Politics of Fear. The title just that Blitt has coined on hi s work conveys a message that certain politicians are contend on peoples fear that Obama was black, a Muslim, a terrorist and unpatriotic. Most importantly, the illustration was a satire because the artwork itself is full of symbolisms that convey irony and sarcasm. One, the Obamas were smiling. Two, Barracks thawb is not pure white unlike Osama Bin Ladens pure white cap and robe at the backdrop portrait.A pure white cloth has unique symbolisms in the Islamic faith. Three, Michelle crossed her legs while standing up as if track her fingers in wishful thinking. Four, the assault rifles color did not really feel like the real AK47 with a brown, wooden stock and wooden barrel encasement. Finally, although the American flag was in the fireplace with flames, the flag was not in flames and is not burning. The flag stayed whole and was not even partially consumed by fire.Nevertheless, some people disagree and contend that the cover was an insult and racist. Jane Hamsher of FireDogLake ob served Most people who see this cover are just going to see the image of Obama in a turban. It reinforces a critical piece of misinformation that right wing propagandists have advanced in order to poison the political climate in this country and make it that much more difficult for a person of color to be elected president (Stirland). Roger Simon noted It probably doesnt encourage people to vote for him in America today. (Stirland). Likewise, John Aravosis of Weblog said Is the New Yorker so out of touch that they dont realize that much of America, or at least too much of America, harbors these very concerns about Obama and his wife? (Stirland). Finally, Matt of The Acropolis, sarcastically observed Ive heard so many an(prenominal) students at MSU tell me, Aw, come on, man. Everyone knows that guys a freaking Muslim. Ok, perhaps it was only, like two students, but Ive heard even more adults say the same thing. Its truly insane. In conclusion, Blitts cartoon cover of The New York er magazine is a satire. The magazine is widely known for its criticisms and satires and literary views on social and political issues. This cartoon is not the starting signal satire that The New Yorker had published or Blitt created. The magazine had no gravid intentions for Obamas political career or his personal life. The New Yorker was just trying to make business and doing what they were known for. Perhaps people should look more closely before making a judgment when they see something out of the ordinary.