Love and Loneliness using Sputnik Sweetheart by Haruki Murakami Essay

Humans argon probably the greediest animals that have walked on the face of earth. There is always a want to achieve roughlything great than what one has. This might be a positive force on one hand, alone on the different it evict leave soul every in all unsatisfied and unhappy with their tone. One of the things out of the m both which universe strive to look for in their life is chouse. do it, a recurring substructure in noels, movies, music, poetry, drama and what non, is hard to escape from.Whether it is motherly, friendly or amorous venerate, we all have experienced it at some point in our lives. precisely does write out actually live? If we look at this drumhead from Haruki Murakamis Sputnik peach trees point of view, the answer would be no. Even though delight in is a major part of the allow, on that point is not a single moment where two state argon in hunch forward with each other. all told the characters of the restrain have had some experience w ith esteem, tho in the end all of them are managing their induce lives all by themselves. The guard strongly hints the nonexistence of warmth and the lonesomeness caused by it. The best way to know as to what exactly love is, is to look inside our own self. If we claim to see it, something must be going on inside our bodies to give us that sense of move or being in love. Firstly, its your brain, not your heart, that falls in love (Myers, 51).It is evident from many scientific and psychological experiments that human romanticistic love is associated with dopaminergic pathways in the brain (Fisher, Aron, Brown, 2175). So when Sumire, a lesbian in the book Sputnik Sweetheart, fell in love, as if she was crossing a playing area when bang a bolt of lightning zapped her right in the head, the real culprits were something know as neurotransmitters and hormones which are, in simple words, chemicals in our physical structure that control us (Murakami, 9). Sumire was in the lust a natomy and well-nigh probably under the beguile of the hormones called testosterone and oestrogen.These hormonesas Helen Fisher hypothesises compact you out looking for anything (The Science of Love). The second phase or the truly love struck phase is seen in the book when Sumire cannot escape from the thoughts of Miu (The science of love). Thats the ballpoint pen pen she uses the mug she drinks coffee from (Murakami, 50). One cannot blame Sumire for being so sappy as she has no control over the dopamine, serotonin and noradrenaline levels in her bole. These chemicals are responsible for the cloud-nine savoring, and the loss of appetite, sleep and assiduity when one is in love. This is seen in Sumires case too when each single time she sat down to start writing something no matter how much she stared at the screen, not a single designate came to her (Murakami, 36).Heart racing, flushed cheeks, butterflies in the stomach, these all the signs of being in love, but it is not love, it is that chemicals in our bodies fashioning us retrieve that way. Very closely tied to the brain is our mental psych and genetic theme and it can help explain the complex topic of love well. The main(prenominal) objective of animals and plants on this earth is to make more of their material body so that their genes are passed on, have a better chance of surviving in the future, and can compete against others genes. Like any other animal, humans are predisposed to this kind of behaviour too. In Sputnik Sweetheart K, the narrator and Sumires best friend, is in love with Sumire who is a lesbian and hence cannot satisfy his love. Even though K knows Sumire is the one he has admittedly feelings for, his body seeks sex.This makes him sleep around with other women on a daily basis. though these little flings neer aroused much passion in him they were, at close a kind of comfort for his body (Murakami, 64). According to the Maslows hierarchy of needs, sex is considered as important as air, sleep, food and protection (Myers, 331). It is one of the basic needs in life regardless of any emotional connection to the other mortal. Also, all the women who K had physical relationships with were elder and either were matrimonial or had fiancs or steady boyfriends.psychological science can explain even this as men are most attracted to women who were at ages associated with peak fertility and thus teen boys are most excited by a woman several years cured than themselves. (Myers, 106). When it comes to attraction every small factor like skin, smell and body shape play a huge role in decision making whether a woman is good to mate with or not (Myers, 106). All these behaviours are a result of a phenomenon known as pictorial selection where nature selects behaviours that increase the likelihood of sending ones gene into the future (Myers, 106). So in the end, it is not us who run to decide who we will pair up with and have children with, but it is our gene s that apprehend to choose.How can love exist when we do not even grasp to choose the person we get attracted to? After looking at the scientific explanations of love, it is important to know how philosophy describes it to get an overall idea of what love is. Kierkegaard, an existentialist philosopher believes only Christian love is true and all other love, whether humanly speaking it withers early and is altered or fondly preserves itself for a round of timesuch love is suave transient it merely blossoms. This is precisely its weakness and tragedy, whether it blossoms for an hour or for 70 yearsit merely blossoms. (25).There is no sense of any kind of God in the book Sputnik Sweetheart, so in that respect is no casualty of Christian love which Kierkegaard seems to support. The only kind of love seen in the book is either friendly or erotic love. But what he tell about other kind of love, like Eros, seems to be very true since there is not a single moment where two people tr uly love each other and show it the love people have for each other never really blossoms.Kierkegaard in his body of work of love understandably states that there is no love if it bears no issue and in the book, there is no fruit, only loneliness which can be considered as the opposite of something fruitful (28). When Miu rejects Sumires love, Sumire disappears from everyones lives, which was very saddle-sore for K as well as Miu. And when she comes back to K she admits how she feels and says I think I cut somethings throat. One cannot say if she meant it literally or not, but even if she said it metaphorically, she must feel extremely dreadful to say something like that. Secondly, love makes one completely dependent on someone else. When Sumire leaves everyone without any proper explanation K admits, She Sumire helped me forget the undertone of loneliness in my life.His love for Sumire is making him completely dependent when throughout the book it is shown how much she who is de pendent on him. Love has turned the tables for him and now he is the one who is weak and vulnerable. And anyway, there is no point of loving someone if it keeps making one feel more and more alone. It is impossible to see the good part love plays as there is none. And as Kierkegaard said, love does not exist if it does not bear any fruits. If one was asked tosummarise the story line of Sputnik Sweetheart it would be something like this K, the narrator, loves Sumire, but Sumire realises she is lesbian when she falls for Miu, a married woman 17 years elder to Sumire, and hence she cannot love K back. But due to an extraordinary incident, Miu has lost all sexual desires and so cannot reciprocate Sumires love.So after disappearing like sess for a few days, Sumire comes back to K to give their love a try even though she knows she is a lesbian (Murakami, 103). It is easy to patch out that there is a constant search for love in Sumires life. In the spring of her twenty-second year, Sumir e fell in love for the low time in her life. (Murakami, 5). Even though in naughty school she had a few boyfriends, guys shed go to the cinema with, go swimming with, she took 22 years long to visit the right person to fall in love with, and when she finally did, it was someone she could not get (Murakami, 11). If it was something other than love, one would have long given up on it. It is called learned helplessness in psychology.But, Sumire did not stop from trying to find love all over again and she came back to K. Love clearly seems to be a function in life for some people. But what is the purpose of life? There is a point in the book where K realises and says, Id have to survive on my own. (Murakami, 187) even so much we, as humans, feel that we are living for a purpose and there are people who care and love, the truth is that we are all by ourselves.K realises it, even though it is quite far into the book, but he does in, and in a rather painful way. Sputnik Sweetheart, th e name of the book itself, suggests loneliness as it refers to Sputnik II, the Soviet satellite which was launched into musculus quadriceps femoris with the dog Laika, the first living being to go into space which died barking of hunger. It gives a picture of the dark, bright eyes of the dog gazing out of the tiny window into the empty space all alone (Murakami, 10).What is it about love that makes humans so horrific for it? Biology and psychology clearly explain that it is just how our bodies are do and how the animal kingdom functions. Also, according to Kierkegaard, erotic, romantic, friendly or philia love is just temporary and never develops fully. It is also seen that being in love never has a positive outcome and from what Kierkegaard said love does not exist if it does not produce something useful. So why is it that we keep seeking love? Are we just lonelyand anxious to find something more than life itself? Is it that we are lonely and by ourselves in this world, and hen ce cannot love, or is it that we cannot love that is why we are lonely? Either way, there is no love, but only loneliness.Work CitedThe Science of Love. BBC lates. BBC, n.d. Web. 14 May 2013. Myers, David G. Myers Psychology for AP. New York, NY Worth, 2011. Print. Helen E. Fisher, Arthur Aron and Lucy L. Brown Philosophical Transactions Biological Sciences , Vol. 361, No. 1476, The Neurobiology of Social Recognition, attractive feature and Bonding (Dec. 29, 2006), pp. 2173-2186