Good Leadership Is More Important Than Good Management Essay

drawing cardship and watchfulness atomic number 18 crucial parts that determine the political partys further trainment. Management tries to restrainer everything even humans, whereas leaders tackle to liberate humans and powers (Kotter 2001). Generally, the campaign way does is to make plan and budget, organize, control and solve the problem. The draw a bead on of palmment is to set up the rules. The leaders work is to ensure the guidance and target of the bon ton, integrate all the resources, move and encourage employees, its aim is to budge, and it is obviously that this is the way starring(p) runs (Kotter 2001).More specially, lead c atomic number 18s about the assess and meaningfulness, whether the target the judicature has carry outd is worth or not. Leadership follows closely to humans, the dignity, respect, potential and development. If management is concentrate on technology and means, procedures and methods, wherefore lead put emphasis on humanity an d objective, the results and art (Northo drop 2007). For example, management is focus on the function of power, scarce leaders c argons the effect of enchantment.In fact, for every agreement even country, they need dickens leadership and management. The aim cannot be discoverd if lacking any one of these two. Since the leadership is playing the direction instructor role in the management process, this essay believes leadership is much than crucial. Therefore, the essay testament first stir a literature followup on leadership and management, follo pull throughg(a) that, it will explain the interdependence of some(prenominal) two functions. Finally, it will illustrate the reason why leadership is more(prenominal) definitive through examples.Many studies have research on leadership and management from variant spot. According to Kotter (2001), the meaning of management is dealing with the appoint task, managers do key works much(prenominal) as planning, organizing and controlling, and then achieve the expected goal. Through management, the contemporary organization performance can be maintained efficiently (Cuban 1988). It is certainly that in the management process, the leadership will always exhibits, further the main functions of management is preservation rather change (Bush & Heystek 2003).Both of management and leadership have their special value towards motley situations, however, management deals with the technical issues trance leadership deals with values (Bush and Heystek 2003). According to Kouzes and Posner (2002), leadership is the ability how the leader encourages others to volunteer to make efforts to the organization. As for leadership, it has five following styles country club management, team management, organization man management, impoverished management, and endorsement obedience (Blake & Mouton 2003).Among these five styles, team management is proposed most. Blake and Mouton (2003) weigh the leadership is the ability to deal with both production and humans, and team management is the most inhibit one. In terms of Fiedler (1967), the situation has more function on leadership. Three main situations be leader member relationship, the bodily structure of the military mission and the authority power. Different situation will fork out unlike leadership. Furthermore, all these three divisions similarly have impact on the leadership.Tannenbaum and Schmidt (1958) cogitate four main styles, autocratic, k without delayn as the telling style, the leader takes the mission and let it known to the group persuasive (the selling style), the leader would analogous to motivate the group without discussion, only through persuading them to believe the tasks is a faithful chance consultative (the consulting style), the leader will consider members advices and their feelings when facing the decisions democratic (the joining style), the leader will invite discussion, in this step the leader is not only a dec ision maker.Presently, how the organization can adapt to the fast changing society has become a little problem for people to think about. In much(prenominal) a agonistic era which is compete on companionship (Bell 1999), an organization, particularly an enterprisingness which wants to gain the everlasting advantage should focus on both leadership and management, in this way to adapt to the changing world and keep the competitive advantage (Welch, J & Welch, S 2005). Although the leadership and management are diverse, both of they are very crucial to the organization and interact each other.Therefore, the organization needs both the objective involve from managers and vision brought by the leaders (Bolman & Deal 1997). For achieving the vision and keeping high efficiency of the organization, it is necessary to liquidate great attention to both leadership and management. The interdependent relationship in the midst of leadership and management can be illustrated through bala nced scoreboard (Kaplan & Norton 2005) faten in the following figure.The Banlance Scorecard (Kaplan & Norton 2005) According to the figure above, it looks into the key area of a melody, external area manage consumers, financial performance, inhering one such(prenominal) as innovation and learning process. It clear shows a comprehensive view of the two functions. Managers should use measurable methods to have a deep correspondence of consumers demands, and leader should soften the company goal with these demands. Managers are required to use any internal business dodging to let the consumer satisfied while leaders are give all the supports that reach that strategy.So chthonic nowadays such a fierce worldwideized competition, every company wants to submit the consumers and market share. So the managers and leaders are pretty interdependent, with leaders are responsible for search the demand to adapt the change, and managers control the process and give advices. It is thus c lear that proper leadership and good management are very important aspects of an organization, however starts from the key esprit of the firm, leadership represents the excellence of the enterprise, and it could view the value of every employee.Leadership needs sustained training and creation, it is take as the key factors that influence the development, alternative and reproduce of an organization. Based on this commiserateing, compared with good management good leadership is a more critical issue. Following section will take Sony and P&G as cases to explain why leadership is more important than management. Sony is a leading firm in the high-tech manufactures industry, it first develops the memory stick and MP3 player, only its gross revenue revenue did not performance well. And soon after the appear of Samsung and orchard apple tree, Sony was soon surpassed by the two competitors.Samsung has more brand value than Sony since 2005, and the Ipod and Macbook from Apple are popul ar rather than Vaio (Chang 2008). Actually a firm like Sony who can perform on the international stage will of career have a good management within the company for until now Sony hush up do a very good trouble. And from the external environment, the different strategies Sony and Samsung takes will not lead to the different performance on its sales. Sony has the even off strategy, the complete resources, the powerful energy, but the winner turns to Apple and Samsung.Why Sony could so easily be surpassed by the competitors? The main reason why such gap exists is because the company lacks of the leadership. Many enterprises failed cod to the unsuccessful integration of strategy and operation. Take Sonys competition with Apple as an example, Apple has no core technology on the MP3 player market, all the things they do is to apply the innovation with its computer processor technology. But in the contrast, although Sony has every factor to success, the wrong steps results in the los t in the MP3 player market.Sony took antiaircraft strategy rather than offensive one, such strategy is not appropriate to its market and organizational management. There are two characteristic of current market the rapid change of new technology and the fast derogation of old ones. Sony actually do little effort to face the two emerging companies, the new leader team organized by the testis president of Sony could not meet their new visions. Why Apple and Samsung could win is not only because they know the market make out and importance of innovation, but alike because the right vision from the leaders.The vision is not a reverie but based on the careful market analysis and knowledge of current organizational situation. This is the reason Sony failed in the competition and meanwhile it also shows the more importance of leadership than management. Senge (1994) verbalise that an efficient leadership is that the leader could change the path of an organizations development and de stiny, because every success eventually depends on the leaders. P&G, a worldwide successful company in FMCG (Fast Moving Consumer Goods) industry, their leadership management is a good control to learn.There has a rule in P&G, inter-dependence is a life-style (McDonald 2009). Every department, products and areas among the company should trust each other and closely encourage. P&G is proud of getting the success if take others advices. The rule shows P&G has make a closely partnership with their suppliers, consumers, communities and employees. In this way, P&G has build an entire smooth value chain and leads to a multiple- win situation. Good leadership shown in P&G Company as following Friendly and long-term cooperation with partners. P&Gs leadership with partners could be shown as they always built a long-term relationship.Many partners think P&G has sufficient respect toward its partners. The reason P&G seldom change partners is due to two reasons first is in this way to ke ep the brand image, entropy is P&G hopes the partners should be familiar with P&Gs business, thus they can reduce lots costs and time. Innovative cooperate strategy. P&Gs another leadership performs to be notional cooperation with Wal-Mart. When many manufacturers are complained about big retail stores such as Wal-Mart and Carrefour, P&G always take an initiative office staff in the bargaining with the retailers.P&G make an evolution on its hand over chain. They use the information technology to realize the continuous replenishment program,which manage the products by categories. The team from P&G and Wal-Mart are from many departments such as sales, marketing, operation, IT and finance, but they share the same goal. In the cooperate process, P&G carefully absorb the advices from the retailers and at the same time, P&G design some products for Wal-Mart. The two companies also intend to expand their business into other areas. Provide training and communication with employees. P&G regards people as their wealth.P&G provide systematic training program, internal promotion. Most of the management is recruiting internally this basically amplificationd the employees loyalty. Besides, P&G not only provide a competitive wages, but also its comfortable working environment. All these are the elements that can show P&G performance on leadership. P&G takes more social responsibility. Aims at sustainable management and environment protection, from 1994, P&G would release its global environment reports to the public annually. Its target is to show a clear vision of the companys work for improving the global environment.Commitment to consumers. P&Gs belief is they produce and carry best quality products in order to improve the life of global consumers. As returns, they will first gain the leading market position and increasing profit, thus to make the society prosperity which our employees, stakeholders works and lives in. P&G put customers as the first position they l isten to their suggestions, including sales and R&D. P&G set the free call for consumers in order to keep connection with consumers, they always think and solve the problems from consumers perspective and explore the potential demands. 3E model.The 3E model of P&G is ultimately an magnificent indication of their works on leadership. The 3E model includes envision, energize, enable. Envision encourages people to have a clear plan and strategy toward their targets, concentrate on achieve the goal find the possibility and not the limitations. Energize inspire employees to listen, understand and trust, approve the employees performance. Enable improve employees productivities. And also create viable conditions for employees to get success. The 3E model seems very simple but it has included everything colligate to the leadership.In this model, leadership is a behavior not a job. It clearly gives three missions to the managers setting the goal, inspiring the employees, provide any mil itary services. From all these aspects of P&G case, people can know that leadership is not dependable depends on one person or one group, it rely on the whole organization. And leadership not only considers for small aspects such as company strategies, but also considers more about the social responsibility it have in the society. Generally speaking, there are three outcomes of keen leadership -The productivity.The only results when the employees cannot finish his job on time are the waste of time and the reduction of quality. The main reason of such here and now is the uncertain guidance and follow-ups. If the leader cannot offer guidance the employees need, then the job cannot achieve the expected level. So lots of time and strength are wasted thus reduced the productivity. -The stability within the organization. As said above, the current society is based on knowledge. If the organization wants to approve the value of the employees, it should provide continuous training and de veloping opportunities for them.In this way to show the organizations confirmation on their value through spending time and bullion invest on the knowledge. The company could use such method to increase the stability of the employees and improve the efficiency. -The consumers satisfaction. The magnificent external consumer services are based on the internal customer service. If the company could realize that the employees are the key customers for them, then they could get the chance to earn huge profit. As a leader, the companys attitude towards the employees mainly determines whether they wish to work for the company.To care the employees give the company a chance to provide an slight consumer services from inside-out. Bass and Avolio (1994) mentioned that the leadership should include behaviors like inspiring others, expert stimulation, coaching and development, respect and faith. This paper thinks, the leadership is, under the organizations process of implement its target, t he ability of the leader influence other relate be led and the interaction amid leader and the one to be led. The leadership itself is not only a capability but also a process. In the process, it includes the process of onstruct a binary relationship between the leader and followers, and also includes the functions leader set the organization, improve the efficiency, and leaders help organization adapt the environment, develop and innovative process.? Conclusion To sum up, good management is also an important issue concerning the organizational development. The reason why leadership is more important is that leadership is on a high level. Take riding the horse as example if the stableman has an excellent technique to control the horse, perhaps the stableman has management talent.But if he always goes to the wrong direction, that is to say, though the high technique of his management, but still cannot achieve the target, then he is doing the incorrect thing. Clawson (2008) said th at leadership is zero point if without changes. So under nowadays a fiercely global trend competition and rapid changing of information and technology, leadership becomes more important for the organization. But only integrate the power of these two functions can, the organization develop on the right way.