Thursday, April 18, 2019
No topic Discussion Question Mgt 380 Dissertation
No topic Discussion move Mgt 380 - Dissertation ExampleThere argon times when the wrong decisions are made and the question of accountability comes into the equation. This is when head teacherers have to explain how and why they were made, and what recourse has to be made to recuperate losses as well as corporate images. Circumstances that pose immediate danger to life, property, sales revenues however, may lead to other leaders arising from lower level in the ranks to take charge. A building on approach or a compevery vehicle tied up in an accident traffic accidents and workers are indecisive as top what to do, are also typical examples of situations where participants go out be require to get through quick decisions. However, in the design of a product, choosing the most economical distribution routes, the location of the best manu positionuring sites, as well as who to employ to fill certain positions, require considering alternatives, as well as others, and has to be done b y trained and experienced executives. Leaders may also from time reject suggestions that do not conform to their expectations, but may suffer from a lack of cooperation when time comes for execution of the strategical decision that was un-democratically made. Decision making according to Drucker, should rest always with executives or leaders who should strive to maximise the inputs of their respective aggroups as much as possible. During such process they should make it known that the final right for the decision rests with them, but they value the contribution of every participant, and will consider all options before decision making (Drucker 1974). Question Q 2 Power according to Etzioni, can be either coercive, utilitarian or normative (Tichy & Candwell 2002). The first type of leader uses force to get the job done, while the second uses incentives, especially in a working environment to contact the same objective. Normative Power occurs when values are occupied to appeal to the inner constitution of population to generate commitment and a sense of purpose. The kind of force out that I can identify is the normative one, where people are treated with respect, and their opinions valued in any business or social operation. By constantly communicating those attributes people who are so treated, will feel a part of my team and will go the extra mile to help achieve the mutually established goals and objectives. In addition, at times I will employ the utilitarian etymon of power along with the normative to help my teams motivated. This is because although they will feel important, at times rewards will distribute to reinforce those values that have been communicated to them. Having these two sources at my disposal will always lead to people become loyal, committed, disciplined and very flexible in a knowledge base economy that is subjected to ever-changing conditions at times. These are the values that I may be able upon in times of crisis, when team support and innovations becomes extremely important to the maintenance of competitive edge. Discussion Q 3 My ducky and least favorite chiefes were on opposite ends of a continuum, due to the leadership traits that they portrayed. The relationship between my most favored boss and me was an excellent one, and it made the work flow easy, even though at time some of the tasks were challenging. The fact that he was approachable, had an open door policy and
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment